The Plot of the Play:
The play is organized into
seven Acts. In Act I, we are introduced
to the rationale of Chanakya’s scheme to bring over Rakshasa as the prime
minister to ChandraGupta. We are
introduced to his extra-ordinary spy network.
One of the spies informs Chanakya that, purely by accident, he has got a
ring bearing the seal of Rakshasa on it.
Chanakya, at once, realizes the damage this ring can do to Rakshasa-it
canenable letters to be written with the seal of Rakshasa on them-and promptly
dictates such a letter (which he gets written by a close confident of Rakshasa
without the latter realizing it was composed by Chanakya). The letter is worded in a vague language,
hinting at the possible betrayel of MalayaKetu, the king who hopes to topple
ChandraGupta, and with whom Rakshasa has sought refuge. We learn that Rakshasa’s family had, until
recently, been harboured by one
ChandanaDasa, the chief of the Jewellers’ Guild. Chanakya summons ChandanaDasa, and wants to
know the present whereabouts of Rakshasa’s family, but ChandanaDasa does not
know anything. However, he makes it
clear that he is very loyal to Rakshasa, and would not part with this
information, even if he did have it.
Chanakya orders the imprisonment of ChandanaDasa and his family, and
confiscation of his property. Chanakya
calculates that Rakshasa will surrender himself if ChandanaDasa were to be
threatened with execution for his help Rakshasa. Chanakya also stages a mock execution of two
of his spies, who are, in fact, allowed to escape to Rakshasa, so that they can
be seen as taking refuge with Rakshasa.
In Act II, we get some
insights into Rakshasa’s character. We
are told stories of different schemes plotted by Rakshasasto eliminate
ChandraGupta, but each time, foiled by Chanakya. We see that Rakshasa, while clever, is no
match to Chanakya, when it comes to intigues.
Rakshasa’s qualities are highlighted vividly. He is not a clever leader, but, perhaps, he
is a good administrator; loyal, trusting, too trusting, in fact, and often
clumsy in execution of intricate schemes.
Act III presents a
clash, concocted by Chanakya, between him and chandraGupta, to mislead
Rakshasa.
In act IV, we see some
elements of Chanakya’s plan taking shape. Spies of Chanakya goad MalaKetu into
believing about possibility of Rakshasa joining forces with ChandraGupta, after
the ‘split’ with Chanakya. MalayaKetu
emerges from hiding, and with Rakshasa, they decide to attack Pataliputra.
Act V gives the details
of the way the scheme, devised by Chanakya, develops. Two spies, within MalayaKetu’s hearing, say
that, his father was assassinated not by Chanakya, as MalayaKetu believes, but
by Rakshasa. This increases MalayKetu’s
suspicions about Rakshasa’s loyalties.
At this moment, the letter that was written by Chanakya and sealed with
Rakshasa’s seal is intercepted from a spy.
Reading the letter, vaguely worded, gives enough indication to
MalayaKetu that, Rakshasa, along with some of the kings at present with
MalayaKetu, is about to double-cross and move over to ChandraGupta. The fact that it has Rakshasa’s seal on it
proves its authenticity, and it does not help Rakshasa when the handwriting
(unwittingly written) is seen to be that of one of his close confidants. Now MalayaKetu loses all confidence in
Rakshasa, and he is disgraced.
Act VI shows a fake
execution stage managed by Chanakya. We
learn that the particular kings that were supposed to have crossed over to
ChandraGupta were put to death by MalayaKetu.
The rest of the kings have revolted and made MalayaKetu their
prisoner. Rakshasa is told that his
friend ChandanaDasa, who had sheltered Rakshasa’s family, was to be
executed. Rakshasa decides to give
himself up to save his friend’s life.
The last Act VII shows
the final surrender of Rakshasa, when ChandanaDasa is about to be executed. Chanakya agrees to release ChandanaDasa,
provided that Rakshasa accepts the sword of the office of prime minister of
Magadha. Chanakya explains to Rakshasa
why he had to devise such a complex scheme to get over Rakshasa to his side,
and why indeed Rakshasa is indispensable to ChandraGupta. He knows that the kingdom is safe in
Rakshasa’s capable hands-for once he declares his loyalty, and accepts the
sword of office publicly, his loyalty is assured-and Chanakya retires to his
ashram, back to his teaching. According
to history, Chanakya never again took any interest in the affairs of the state,
but wrote a masterpiece on the economics and politics of ruling a state, called
Arthasastram.
No comments:
Post a Comment